It’s not unreasonable for us to have honest discussions about our laws as times change. The foundation of the second amendment is eroded more by excessive military spending than it is by the discussion of better regulation of assault rifles and handguns. The fundamental reason for the second amendment is to keep our citizens safe and free, and that it is possible for a time to come in which protecting the unfettered right to bear arms may result in a society which is less free than one which only gives that right to those who have earned it.

I’m a gun owner. I’m a Republican. I’m a patriot. I believe the right to free speech should is more important than the right to own a weapon. Our ability to discuss these issues in a manner that does not devolve into petty squabbling is the mark of an enlightened society which continues to grow from our darkened roots of war, disease, and poverty.

I want a smaller government, not a larger one, and yet, I also see that with a diverse population comes the need for codified laws which protect the meek more than the strong.

As with every era, we face challenges to our beliefs, crises of faith, and tests of our resolve. We should not legislate in haste, but nor should we ignore events which serve as warnings.

Isn’t it ok to have a conversation about forms of gun control without witless character assassinations of those who would come to the table to discuss the possibility? Our constitutional republic means that we don’t always get what we want - we get the result of an interpretation of our values based on the votes of the majority. It’s in the best interest of the cause you promote to be well reasoned.

That being said, I do think it’s time to have a civil discussion on the merits of stronger regulation.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment II, The Bill of Rights

The founding fathers knew the importance of regulation. That’s why we have laws. They knew the importance of people being able to defend themselves, that’s why we have the second amendment. They also knew the importance of those laws keeping pace with the times. A man can defend himself and his home without automatic rifles. In fact, they make a far poorer choice for home defense than a shotgun (for a variety of reasons).

We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.

Thomas Jefferson

We cannot be enslaved by the notions of our founding fathers, we must use their wisdom as a guide, not a noose.